July 19, 2004 - Badrinarayan das (Robert Morrill), a member of the current non-elected illegal ISKCON GBC, entered the “DIRECTION OF MANAGEMENT” as evidence into the Long Island, New York Court, as it is the only document that legitimizes the existence of the ISKCON GBC.
"Your Honor, this is the Direction Of management that establishes the GBC and talks about its authority."
Transcribed Document
NEW YORK – Badrinarayan das’ Statement to Long Island Court
July 19, 2004 - Badrinarayan das (Robert Morrill), a member of the current non-elected illegal ISKCON GBC, entered the "DIRECTION OF MANAGEMENT" as evidence into the Long Island, New York Court, as it is the only document that legitimizes the existence of the ISKCON GBC.
"Your Honor, this is the Direction Of management that establishes the GBC and talks about its authority." Page 3
"And I should mention that this document is quoted, it is referenced, it is well-known. It’s the basis of the decisions, the basis of our authority." Page 6
FROM THE COURT DOCUMENTS
SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NASSAU : TRIAL TERM PART 15
-----------------------------------------------------X
EDWARD KELLEY a/k/a ADARSI DAS. THE
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY KOR KRISHNA
CONSCIOUSNESS, INC., and THE
GOVERNING BODY COMMISSION OF THE
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA
CONSCIOUSNESS,
Plaintiffs.
- against -
 Badrinarayan Dasa a.k.a. Robert Morrill |
ARUNA GARUDA a/k/a ARUNA DEVI DAS,
VISWA GARUDA a/k/a VISWA PRANA DASA,
VIJAW SHAW, WYNDELL WYNTER a/k/a
ARAVINDAKSA DAS AND SHALINI AGARWAL,
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------X
July 19, 2004
Mincola, New York
MINUTES OF HEARING
BEFORE HON. ROY S. MAHON, Justice.
Morril – for Plfd. Direct eccliastical.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. CHITTUR:
Q: - Drawing your attention to Plaintiffs' Exhibit 12 and exhibit 13?
MR. CHITTUR: Would you please show the witness these documents, please. 12 first.
Q: - We have no evidence that anything that is Stated in here was filed with the Secretary of State in New York; is that correct?
A: - I don't know.
Q: - We have no evidence that any part of this document was ever adopted by the plaintiff corporation in New York. Is that correct?
A: - I don't know.
Q: - Now, let's take a look at Plaintiffs Exhibit 13. Again, we have no evidence that any part of this document was filed with the Secretary of State in connection with the plaintiff corporation in New York; is that correct?
A: - We know that it was followed all around theworld by all of our temples for the —
Q: - Let‘s answer my question. We have no evidence saying that this document or any part of this document was filed with the Secretary of State in connection with the plaintiff corporation in New York?
A: - I don’t know.
Q: - We have no evidence that any portion of this document, Plaintiffs' Exhibit 13. was adopted by the plaintiff corporation in New York; is that, correct?
A: - We know that it followed all of its principles.
Q: - Let's answer my question.
A: - Otherwise I never would have written that letter. So we know that it was being followed.
MR. CHITTUR: Move to strike. Judge.
Q: - Let's answer my question.
THE COURT: If you would, kindly answer the ….
Please also see:
Declaration of Will
Direction Of Management
What is the Direction of Management [DOM] ?
Direction Of Management For An Elected GBC